• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I would say that the number of games where that message is core and is reliably reinforced through the gameplay is small.

    Getting Over It, for example, would not need an ‘easy mode’, but the vast majority of games should be accessible to as wide an audience as possible - not by compromising the devs’ vision, but by simply allowing players the tools to handle the game at their own pace.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Granted, but I’d argue that dark souls and Elden ring, the typical subjects of this debate, are exactly that. There’s no way to add an easy mode without compromising the dev’s vision. And based on fromsoft’s reticence to add an easy mode, I think they agree.

      • Randomguy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        There’s no way to add an easy mode without compromising the dev’s vision.

        It would be as easy as putting a slider to reduce damage taken/increase damage inflicted.

        If people want to go experience they can play the og game.

        Take Celeste for example. Celeste is a game meant to be hard, beating Celeste is supposed to be a trial for the player, it’s their mountain to conquer.

        And yet, Celeste gives so many accessibility options you can trivialize the game. The people that need it get to play the game and the people that don’t need it, play the game as intended.

        That’s not to say that Dark Souls should have an easy mode. Just saying that it could, easily, have one. They don’t because they’d rather maintain the image of being a hardcore™ game than help people with less time/skill/capabilities play the game.