• BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Apple will happily throw away a good machine to sell you a new one, their eco friendlyness and repairability scores are self scored bullshit.

    Having police access to everyone’s phone would not make people safer. You would not have enough police to monitor and it is a backdoor for hacking.

    Just like Intel Management Engine that gave hackers passwordless entry into machines. Having control like that is not safety.

    Plus anyone with physical access is going to defeat security anyway.

    My linuxOS has a MOC signed by microsoft, an OS can work on TPM with a signature…hackers will find a way to spoof into it

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Apple will happily throw away a good machine to sell you a new one, their eco friendlyness and repairability scores are self scored bullshit.

      That’s beside the point. They make their machines with recycled materials, and it’s a fact. There are people using 10 year old MacBooks and iPads, so I don’t think anybody is being forced to “throw away” a good machine.

      Having police access to everyone’s phone would not make people safer. You would not have enough police to monitor and it is a backdoor for hacking.

      That was an example. What they would do is have computer scan your data for illegal content (like they planned to do with iCloud), and any flagged data would get checked by an actual person. If you think this wouldn’t help protect people, you are lying to yourself. Whether this is a privacy issue or not is not the point, the point is that “it’s for the children” is a valid concern for implementing this kind of stuff and not just something to be skeptical about.

      Just like Intel Management Engine that gave hackers passwordless entry into machines. Having control like that is not safety.

      You are still evading the issue at hand. I never claimed backdoors are not a security issue, I said they would definitely help protect the children, as I repeated above.

      Plus anyone with physical access is going to defeat security anyway.

      Obviously. The point of things like TPM is to prevent remote hacking. Who claimed otherwise? You cannot guarantee the safety of any system if the attacker has physical access. I assume your computer doesn’t have a log in password since anyone with physical access can defeat it, right?

      My linuxOS has a MOC signed by microsoft, an OS can work on TPM with a signature…hackers will find a way to spoof into it

      Yes, nothing is foolproof. Should we stop advancing security just because it’s not perfect? Should we stop using SSL/TLS because BREACH and POODLE exploits exist? Should we stop using passwords because someone can brute force them? Maybe we should also throw away memory and thread safe languages because there are some corner cases where they can be used in an unsafe manner? Listen to yourself.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        You sir are deluded. Go watch any Louis Rosdman video about how apple claims a device irrepairable and he fixes it for 5 dollars. Apple is an e waste company