• Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The “unfair advantage” part doesn’t actually exist. It’s been accounted for with the 2 year break you have to take. People who still think there is any unfair advantage involved haven’t actually looked into it.

    It’s easy to get caught up when people say it happens, but every example where people think it happened since the rules around it were set decades ago have been debunked. It’s already been handled. But of course, we always remain open to if there are any other adjusments that still need to be made. Basically, there is just no conspiracy or agenda.

    And honestly, there is no such thing as 100% male or 100% female to start with. That’s just not how the 35 million billion parts humans are comprised of that were never designed to go together in the first place ended up working out when jammed together. Humans are incredibly complex. There are dozens of identified and untold amounts of unidentified markers that determine “how much” male or female our various component makeup is, and the odds of anyone getting 100% of all of them maxxed out to one side is slim enough that it has likely never happened.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not true, as I’ve already pointed out. Males have more stable hips and larger lungs. That doesn’t go away ever.