• growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4日前

    A very neat idea, quite innovative! My initial reaction would be that this would be a great way to recycle panels from larger, traditional projects that are getting upgraded anyway. My concern with new panels is that with moving trains above them, there’s a strong chance for breaks in the glass depending on what’s being transported, and a huge amount of loss due to dirt accumulating. Those conditions may result in harsh losses for new panels, which may be more beneficial in production elsewhere! Mid- to end-of-life panels might not be producing as much power anyway, so getting a second life in a situation like this one might squeeze a little more power out of them that you wouldn’t get otherwise.

    Of course, solar panels are very inexpensive nowadays, so financially it might not make that big a difference, but I think it’s good to think about best use of the resources we have regardless!

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4日前

      This is a great idea!

      To get grant money.

      Otherwise it’s even more stupid than solar roadways.

      I mean except if you live on a planet where 99% of land is rails.

      • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4日前

        Hey, ideas are great to explore, and we don’t know if there’s a place or community this would serve. Not every project has to be scalable! Diversity of uses is a good thing. There’s not a single solution for moving to renewable energy, creativity will be required.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3日前

          It’s great to explore if it didn’t cost anything. Since someone needs to spend money, they do need to use some judgement.

          Technically there’s no reason this can’t function, but practically this is highly sus. The only benefit would be to save a little land, but it’s hard to see any likelihood if it being worthwhile

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4日前

          Yes, with the exception of this project.

          There is not one good idea about it (except if you are on the receiving end of the funding I guess), but lots of really bad ideas about it. Several are outright stupid and unfeasible.