Summary

Ahead of the 2024 election, Generation Z has sparked a trend on TikTok, “canceling out” family members’ votes by voting opposite their Trump-supporting relatives. Many young women post videos showing them voting for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, contrasting with family members supporting Republican nominee Donald Trump.

While some videos are lighthearted, others reveal deeper tensions, as participants highlight personal stakes in defending rights and choices.

Although Gen Z voters lean slightly toward Harris, a significant portion supports Trump, creating a divided landscape. With over 47 million early votes cast, polls show a tight race, especially in key swing states.

  • Narauko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    That is true of everything that isn’t barred by the fundamentals of physics, and disingenuous and you know it.

    You can murder people, you can enslave others, Hindus can slaughter and eat cows, etc, you just don’t want to because it’s illegal.

    For most religious people the tenents of their faith are core to their being and not something they just kinda like. Otherwise they tend to deconstruct from their religion after the inertia runs out. That’s why religion in the West is on a downward trajectory outside of Islam which is driven by immigration.

    I fully support reproductive rights as much as the next guy, but let’s not pretend that the person outlined above single issue voting against abortion isn’t looking at the other side as otherwise great but you have to accept a few sanctioned murders. You would probably be single issue voting if we had a modern Aztec government that was close to a utopia but practiced human sacrifices to Quetzalcoatl because it maintains prosperity.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Real laws are different though, they have a state sanctioned justice system that forces compliance.

      Following a religion in the US is not regulated by law, but is a choice.

      Sadly, groups of people are working to change this.

      If a religion’s rules do become proper laws then you can use “can’t” correctly.

    • ghterve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      But they choose to subscribe to that religion and could choose to stop. They could choose to no longer make it core to their being.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        That is exactly my point, this is similar to veganism/vegetarianism, it is a choice you want to make and continue to make.

        And I get it, I have had the privilege of growing up mostly without religion, that obviously colours my viewpoint, but if people could accept that religion is a choice rather than a fact the world would be a way better place.

        • Narauko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Can you really choose what you believe, though? Could you make yourself stop believing in gravity or anything else you truly believe in? Could you make yourself believe in flat earth if someone told you too? The mind isn’t something so malleable that you get to pick and choose your beliefs like a salad bar. Religious beliefs are one of the hardest to change, with even those leaving organized religion ending up frequently still believing in a God of some kind.

          I grew up in a religious household but open minded and science oriented, so I deconverted and consider myself an atheist. I whole heartedly agree that the world would be a better place without religion, it’s the world’s greatest con job, but let’s not kid ourselves about the spectrum of the word choice here. It’s a (lesser) reverse of the religious telling anyone that isn’t heteronormative in any way that those are choices. It’s all brain chemistry occurring in a black box that we know vanishingly little about for how much we have studied it.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            That is a fair point, and I am not asking to change any persons beliefs, I just think it is a copout to blame X for taking away your agency when you want it taken away.

            • Narauko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              I don’t think they are blaming their religion for their voting in so much as outlining that their convictions that are informed by/in line with their religion (life begins at conception) makes abortion their largest single issue. Those of honest conviction see abortion as murder, and specifically murder of a baby, and that trumps the rest of the ticket. There are plenty of grifters and hypocrites on that side too, but I would hazard that the “silent majority” on the right are the sincere convictions type.