• iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    employee share of contribution to public health insurance fund

    If your employer takes part of your wages and pays, or you take part of your wages and pay. What’s the difference?

    The “employee share” vs “employer share” makes no difference?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even if you were making the point you think you’re making… The US already has employer-contributions to health care, and its a whole lot. My experience likely isn’t the norm as I’m in a union position, but my employer foots the bill for something like ~70% of my health insurance. They take a chunk out of my paycheck, but it’s still only maybe 1/3 of what it actually costs.

      So if you want it to be a fair comparison, you’re going to have to take that into consideration too. If you’re suggesting that an employer in an EU nation will pay someone less because they have to shell out to contribute to their health insurance, then you need to realize that the same conditions are present here.

      It’s not really fair to only include that on one side of the equation, when it is happening on both sides.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        That’s a fair point I did not consider. Thank you.

        I’m mainly confused about the “5% of your paycheck” claim made here.

        It’s way, way higher in places that do have universal healthcare, all things considered.

        People unfamiliar with the system seem to often have unrealistic expectations, exacerbated by political propaganda.