AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoRed Hat strikes a crushing blow against RHEL downstreamswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkRed Hat strikes a crushing blow against RHEL downstreamswww.theregister.comAgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
https://web.archive.org/web/20230624163406/https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/23/red_hat_centos_move/
minus-squareV @beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoYou make a good point. I imagine RedHat is doing this less because of Rocky/Alma, and more so because of Oracle.
minus-squareLaser@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoOracle might be another one, though I guess that as weird as that sounds, at least they add value by providing their “unbreakable enterprise kernel”. I guess Oracle will be hit the least as they do have the manpower to make sure their distribution stays RHEL compatible, but at a higher cost.
You make a good point. I imagine RedHat is doing this less because of Rocky/Alma, and more so because of Oracle.
Oracle might be another one, though I guess that as weird as that sounds, at least they add value by providing their “unbreakable enterprise kernel”.
I guess Oracle will be hit the least as they do have the manpower to make sure their distribution stays RHEL compatible, but at a higher cost.