• jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s like exactly what I said they would do after the original news of the bans from the other day. And I got downvoted for it. Lol

  • gazter
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The possibilities for naming their distro are endless…

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Especially, because they can chose existing names as there is no Copyright in Russia (afaik, probably a wrong myth but idk)

      • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No there was copyright, it was only relatively enforced between 2000-2015 ish. And then probably only in tourist heavy areas. In the olden days you could find any soft on “black markets” in open stalls

    • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Will we finally get the “Putinix” distribution that mines cryptocurrency for the regime by default? It will have to be a new coin called “RuOil”

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They haven’t been removed from the community though — just the maintainers list. Now they need someone else’s review to commit code to the kernel.

    Personally, I think even maintainers should be required to have that — you can be the committer for pre-reviewed code from others, but not just be able to check anything you want in, no matter your reputation (even if you’re Linus). That way a security breach is less likely to cause havoc.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I find that difficult. Aside from code reviews, often times your job as a maintainer is:

      • getting a refactor or code cleanup in while everyone’s asleep
      • shuffling commits around between branches
      • fixing the CI toolchain
      • rolling back or repairing a broken change
      • unfucking the repo
      • fixing a security vulnerability

      A required review slows all of these tasks to a crawl. I do agree that the kernel is important enough that it might be worth the trade-off.
      But at the same, I do not feel like I could do my (non-kernel) maintainer job without direct commit access…

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      At first I thought you meant it’d be a bad fork, but then I realise you meant it’d be a bad fork.

      As long as it’s open source and vetted by the public, I don’t see how it could go bad tbh

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This joke hasn’t aged well. I took it as is and just assumed the Dad put together a micro PC with a PS2 emulator on it, and then I stared at the article for 5 minutes looking for the punchline.