• JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Self hosting isn’t really compatible with viral content, you do something that blows up and either get the hug of death or go bankrupt from the bandwidth costs.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        It doesn’t matter if virality is the goal, unless you’re suggesting it be actively prevented, virality is just a natural phenomenon of the internet. The term viral generally implies uncontrolled exponential spread. To this day, stuff goes viral without people intending it to.

        And if you architect the system to scale a p2p network proportional to virality (ex. as people share it, they also self-host) you run into a ton of security and abuse challenges. We’re also stretching the definition of “self-hosting” at this point.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        55 minutes ago

        We are talking about a TikTok alternative. If getting as many people as possible to see your stuff isn’t your goal, then why would you post it in the first place?
        Making your content go viral is pretty much literally the only point.

        • 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          Virality is nowhere near the only reason for posting videos. People post them to make jokes, teach something, reply to someone else, etc, or all the same reasons someone might make a blogpost or a post on a link aggregator.