Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    anyone wanna take bets on how much pearlclutching surprisedpikachu weā€™ll see

    I suspect weā€™ll see a fair amount. Giving some specifics:

    1. I suspect weā€™ll see Sammy accused of endangering all of humanity for a quick buck - taking Altman at his word, OpenAI is attempting to create something which they themselves believe could wipe out humanity if they screw things up.

    2. I expect calls to regulate the AI industry will louden in response to this - what Sammyā€™s doing here is giving the true believers more ammo to argue Silicon Valley may potentially trigger the robot apocalypse that Silicon Valley themselves have claimed AI is capable of unleashing.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      perhaps saltman will have enough audacity to promote this as a way to ensure that some account is owned by a human, after flooding every corner of internet with ai slop and fake accounts

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        thatā€™s almost certainly the plan ā€” I remember there was some horrific ā€œproof of humanityā€ shit tied in with this, supposedly so that you could tell if youā€™re interacting with a human rather than a chatbot. thereā€™s so many problems with that technically of course, not least of which is the chatbot guy also owning the proof of not-bot, but thereā€™s deeper horrifying implications: this is the technology conservatives have been begging for to block access to ā€œadult sitesā€ (see: LGBTQ+ spaces and associates) and ā€œprotect votingā€ (see: purge voter registries). that the technology is fucking stupid and doesnā€™t work doesnā€™t matter to them ā€” as always with technofascism, thatā€™s a feature.