fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agoArtifical Intelligencemander.xyzimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down117
arrow-up1649arrow-down1imageArtifical Intelligencemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareJohanno@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoMany unedited or using old Ai images I can detect with one look. A few more I can find by looking for inconsistencies like hands or illogical items. However I am sure there will be more AI generated images that may even be a little bit edited afterwards that I can’t detect. You will need an ai to detect them. Since at least in images ai is detectable by the way they create the files.
minus-squareOneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 minutes agoIn AI-generated sound you can see it in the waveform, it has less random noise altogether and it seems like a huge, well, wave. I wonder if sth similar is true for images.
Many unedited or using old Ai images I can detect with one look. A few more I can find by looking for inconsistencies like hands or illogical items.
However I am sure there will be more AI generated images that may even be a little bit edited afterwards that I can’t detect.
You will need an ai to detect them. Since at least in images ai is detectable by the way they create the files.
In AI-generated sound you can see it in the waveform, it has less random noise altogether and it seems like a huge, well, wave. I wonder if sth similar is true for images.