• ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m guessing that the intention is "If Israel can handle missiles from Lebanon and Gaza, why can’t they handle 10 times the normal amount from Iran.
      It’s a numbers game , and w/o the US and Jordan helping to intercept them , the civilian damage would be much much much more extensive; and only one of these 2 can be true - Iran has terrible terrible terrible aim, or they targeted civilians.

      • You’re right about saturation attacks eventually overcoming every air defense. But the ~200 missiles from Iran would have been manageable for Iron Dome, if they were the kind of missile Iron Dome was built for – slow, short range rockets and mortars.

        These were much faster, at least some of them maneuvered during flight and a lot of them had a terminal booster, so they were much faster.

        Israel has systems for that, namely Arrow 2/3 (the latter even intercepts exoatmospheric and it looks fucking dope) and David’s Sling. But they are definitely not made for the sort of massed attack we saw. They’re more like a Patriot system.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Iron dome not intended for ballistic defense, which is what the Iranians chucked at them