Google’s latest flagship smartphone raises concerns about user privacy and security. It frequently transmits private user data to the tech giant before any app is installed. Moreover, the Cybernews research team has discovered that it potentially has remote management capabilities without user awareness or approval.

Cybernews researchers analyzed the new Pixel 9 Pro XL smartphone’s web traffic, focusing on what a new smartphone sends to Google.

“Every 15 minutes, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL sends a data packet to Google. The device shares location, email address, phone number, network status, and other telemetry. Even more concerning, the phone periodically attempts to download and run new code, potentially opening up security risks,” said Aras Nazarovas, a security researcher at Cybernews…

… “The amount of data transmitted and the potential for remote management casts doubt on who truly owns the device. Users may have paid for it, but the deep integration of surveillance systems in the ecosystem may leave users vulnerable to privacy violations,” Nazarovas said…

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Please read the many write-ups by developers of well regarded privacy and security ROMs, such as grapheneOS and divestOS.

    Who detail in great length why root access is a bad idea, and why many apps that require root access, are just poorly developed security nightmares.

    That said, I agree that it should be an option, or at least a standardized means of enabling it. As well as all bootloaders should be unlockable. But phones are more personal devices than the PC ever was, and there are good reasons NOT to push for the proliferation of standardized root access.

    • daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      These writeups never managed to to convince me me that I should not be able to modify any file on my device. If the system is not able to grant this access to me, and me only, while doing it securely, than it’s bad operating system, designed without my interests first on mind. I am absolutely sure that granting so-called “root access” can be done securely, as decades of almost-every-other-OS have shown.

    • Psyhackological@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have GrapheneOS and I know having root is not ideal and I was wondering about https://shizuku.rikka.app/ It looks like a more elegant way to have for some apps higher privileges while preserving security but I’m not sure about it so I’m thinking out loud

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        32 minutes ago

        I will admit that I also use Shizuku, but I only enable it for short bursts when I need access for a very select number of precise use cases. Immediately afterwards, I reboot.

        I also assume that if I spent any amount of time digging into it, I would realize it’s a bad idea, but nothing’s perfect.

        And don’t assume that all apps allowing Shizuku access were developed securely, or that there all developers have good intentions. Really I only use it for Swift, or if I’m really behind on my updates, I’ll briefly allow Droidify access for hands off updating.