• EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m no fan of Stein. I was years ago, but not anymore. But she seems very clear in the beginning, then equivocates in the middle then clarifies (kinda) towards the end— but the way the interviewer goes after her seems like she’s being evasive in a way that doesn’t come across in the textual reading.

    Is there an audio and/or video clip of this interview?

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Thanks for the link, but I deleted my account years ago. No worky for me.

        If anyone could link something else, I’d be quite grateful. 👍

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          He wasn’t being a dick. He was doing what journalists should do. If she answers with an extremely simple, “yes” every single time Netanyahu and Biden come up but literally every single time he asks about Putin she can’t just say, “yes.” Every single time she qualifies a yes or hedges without a yes. She doesn’t with the others.

        • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          She had no problem with Biden and Netanyahu, but avoids a direct answer over Putin. It is painfully obvious

              • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Well, sure. I only wanted to hear all of this in context— and it doesn’t really hello her position IMO.

                It really shouldn’t be so hard to very clearly denounce Putin. She makes it seem like a real chore. Like she has to be squeezed into saying it, and even then, it’s a little unclear, still.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah she explicitly said “yes” multiple times. I don’t like her, but this is garbage.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Because with the other 4 world leaders she said a simple, “yes.” Every single time she was asked about Putin it was either a “yes…” followed by a qualification or a hedged answer that wasn’t a yes.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          its clear she’s being evasive with the putin answers. She’s an absolute disgrace to the green party

      • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Unless she can say the words ‘Putin is a war criminal’ she is avoiding the question. “In so many words” is not a yes. I understand she follows with yes he is, but why can’t she just say yes, Putin is a war criminal?