superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 days agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square242fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square242fedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 days agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)