Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoStand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoLotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoLotRers. Fans of Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoYes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Lotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
It says, in fact, LOπERS.
LOPIERS
WILL BE SH∞T ON SIGHT
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
What’s a loiter?
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.