• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It should be designed to summarize the most relevant parts of the article. In this case its designed to get an emotional response, which is manipulation.

    I will agree its not explicitly misleading, but there are better headlines for this story out there. Feel free to compare yourself.

    • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Get the fuck outta here…

      Great, another article with a misleading headline,

      I will agree its not explicitly misleading

      You can’t have it both ways is it misleading or not?

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Explicitly means it literally says misleading words. Implicitly means it leaves out relevant words.

        Its like lieing by omission.

        In my opinion its misleading, but maybe I just have an awful time parsing headlines.