• Microw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not his property. His gf’s property. Dude has no legal right whatsoever to guard property that isn’t his own, does he?

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well if he “drove over to her property”, he might not even be an occupant

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you drive to your friend’s house for dinner, you’re a legal occupant of their house.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not entirely true.

      When I took my concealed carry class in Tx there was a section on this.

      It depends heavily on the relationship between you and the owner of the property. The example given in the class was a good neighbor relationship and suggested talking about this before something happened.

      I would expect that if the shooter and the owner are in contact during the event to weigh heavily on it.

      The gist is, it depends state-to-state but I would expect that their relationship would make an otherwise LEGAL use of a firearm OK. (I’m really not sure if this is a legal use…)