I tend to browse /All and by New on Lemmy. I went to respond on a thread on [email protected] to thank someone for a recipe that looked good, and found out I had been banned.

Odd, considering I hadn’t posted to that sub at any point in the past. I checked the modlog to find that “Mod” had banned a bunch of people citing “Rule 5.”

Their Rule 5 states: Bad-faith carnist rhetoric & anti-veganism are not allowed, as this is not a space to debate the merits of veganism. Anyone is welcome here, however, and so good-faith efforts to ask questions about veganism may be given their own weekly stickied post in the future (see current stickied discussion).

I (and hundreds of others) seemingly broke rule 5 of this community without ever posting there. What is going on?

And my apologies if this isn’t the place for this, but I had no idea where else to post the question.

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oops you’re right. I did not correctly check the sub. I stand by the rest. Arguing logical fallacies against someone’s diet choices is a dick move and is still arguing against veganism.

    I can’t verify if they were telling people to kill themselves or what that has to do with their reasons for eating plants. If I made death threats online, which no one should do and is a faux pas, I should still be able to use factory farming as a reason for avoiding meat.

    Again, don’t think it’s ban worthy. I’m in the peanut gallery over here just having a good time.

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I also wasn’t arguing against their dietary choices. I was showing that their arguments could be turned back on themselves because they were spurious at best.

      Before I replied, the now-deleted user was stating that there was no reason to eat meat unless you’re a psychopath and love murder and was threatening suicide, violence to others, and other such garbage throughout the thread, then followed it up with a stream of PMs to a bunch of users including myself with some… not great / illegal content (we’ll say).

      My response was purely a “let’s look at your statements, but in good faith” exercise.

      Put simply, they started attacking food choices first and I called them on it. I’m okay with what I said.

      • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You know what? Even with missing the content, I think your statement is fair. I’ve got a sore spot for using fallacies and disagree with your arguments against the reasons for a vegan diet, but you seem genuine in your motives. I apologize for calling you a nugget head.

        • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I legitimately appreciate that.

          As an aside, it’s odd how much was purged from this thread. Not just deleted, but straight up purged so it doesn’t show in the modlogs. I don’t think I’ve seen that done on my instance outside of the illegal stuff. Is that normal here on .world?

          • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t read comments often enough to know what’s normal. The only good reason I can think of is anti-bot/anti-spam measures and even then it’s a bit strange. How do you know they were purged?