• cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah. If they pushed it to the bottom of the list, or even removed them from the list but kept the user count, I could kind of understand it. But censoring them completely for being too successful seems like shooting yourself in the foot.

    Lemmy.world is doing great and I’m happy for it and all that, but… 20 000 monthly active users does not exactly make them a tech giant that needs to be kept in check just yet. Ideally, instances of 20 000 active users should be quite normal at some point, and having stress tested the software before then should, one assumes, be a good thing.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      You probably also have the friction been .world and the developers’ Lemmy.

      There is also a problem that Lemmy seems to be having problems maintaining a good middle ground of Lemmy servers.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      But censoring them completely for being too successful seems like shooting yourself in the foot.

      It honestly has me considering leaving the Fediverse. If this place is so anti- normie, fuck em

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most people are fine. All social media has some bad eggs - admittedly FOSS/GNU/Linux communities are prone to attract a specific breed of them. But they can generally be ignored pretty easily.

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not of Lemmy.world, where you are writing from. And I’m not even writing you from Lemmy. :)

            The developers of the platform are not in control over what it’s used for. Which is what’s neat about these place.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              But the comment alleges the admins of .world removed it from sign up pages due to its popularity. That’s the kind of anti-newbie behavior that turns me off.

              • cabbage@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s the Lemmy developers, who run Lemmy.ml and Lemmygrad.ml, who decided not to promote Lemmy.world on their “about Lemmy” website. This is completely unrelated to the admins of Lemmy.world. :)