We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is tough -

    Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

    (US here) Gets me thinking about dollar store headphones. Consumers could buy decent headphones for about $10 direct from overseas. When that’s equivalent to more than an hour of wages, there’s still demand for the $1 version. Should this need not be met out of a sense of social responsibility?

    (I don’t have a perfect answer myself)

    Econ 101 on my mind here btw:

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem is that our economic system has encouraged an environment where reputation is a thing to be immediately cashed out. You can’t even know if those $10 earbuds are any better than the $1 version.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can make some reasonable assumptions although they will be imperfect:

        Wouldn’t be as frequently imperfect if freaking review fraud weren’t entirely ubiquitous (grrrr)