• vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think they were banned because they didn’t have a representative in the country that they could serve those allegations to.

    • stochastic_parrot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, that’s an oversimplification. The judge has been asking the representatives in Brazil to block some accounts that have been spreading disinformation. The representatives replied to the judge saying they’re just representatives and X/Twitter wouldn’t comply with that request. In Brazil, if you’re the representative of a company, you have to have the power to comply with Brazil’s laws. As they were not complying, the judge gave them extra time to comply and mentioned if they didn’t comply, the local president/director/representative would go to jail. That’s when X/Twitter closed the representation in Brazil.

      After that, the only action left available for the judge was to block X/Twitter.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The judge also blocked all bank accounts for Starlink, a different company.

        While I think the ban is justified, the power the judge has is definitely fishy too.