Sub.club thinks premium feeds could also serve other use cases, like supporting helpful bots or generating funds to help maintain a community’s Mastodon server, for instance.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, how else do you expect things to work? Internet platforms aren’t free to operate. Isn’t paying creators directly supposed to be the ideal solution, instead of infesting pages with ads?

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’re already free to support developers and instance owners financially if they’ve set up either Patreon, OpenCollective or LiberaPay 🤷 That’s money going where it’s needed.

      If I understand SubClub correctly, it’s monetisation on a user level, which in the past has only really given us influencers. I rather enjoy not having that kind of bullshit on the fediverse.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not sure what the difference between SubClub or Patreon is supposed to be. Other than SubClub takes a smaller cut.

        • astro_ray@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s exactly what I thought when I first saw this. The difference in that they market it as a fediverse extension.