• ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean its nothing but a marketing spin all chickens suffer harshly in the egg industry. Even a true CCP devotee wouldn’t be surprised and would probably expect meaningless marketing differences to get a leg up on competition.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      sure, but at least where i am, free-range chickens have a minimum of 1 sq. m. of space, which is 0.9 sq. m. more than otherwise

      • threeduck
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unless you’re a male chicken, then your range is whatever the dimensions of the Live Rooster Masher is.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t talk for the US, but organic labels usually have pretty strict requirements. Enforcement is often lacking though, but it is definitely not just a marketing spin and guaranteed suffering.

      • anguo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        AFAIK, “Organic” usually just restricts what the chicken has been eating/injected with, not it’s living conditions.

        • f314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          In the US, maybe. In Europe there are many restrictions regarding living conditions as well, meaning “organic” is usually the best option if you prioritize animal welfare.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It very much does here in Europe & Germany. But like I said, I can’t speak on the US in that regard. Usually the US is much worse when it comes to regulations though.

      • Bob@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        E 18: Sufficient freedom of movement.

        a. All hens must have sufficient freedom of movement to be able, without difficulty, to stand normally, turn around, and stretch their legs and wings.

        b. They must also have sufficient space to be able to perch or sit quietly without repeated disturbance to other birds.

        That’s, without meaning to sound cute, paltry.

        • potpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah, I should have specified the pasture-raised standards:

          R 1: Pasture area

          a. Must consist mainly of living vegetation. Coarse grit must be available to aid digestion of vegetation.

          c. The minimum outdoor space requirement is 2.5 acres (1 hectare)/1000 birds (~109SF).

          g. Birds must be outdoors 12 months per year, every day for a minimum of 6 hours per day. In an emergency, the hens may be confined in fixed or mobile housing 24 hours per day for no more than 14 consecutive days.

          Free-range are only required to have 2SF and don’t have a mandatory outside time.

          • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            109sf vs 2sf is a much larger difference that I would have thought.