살 and 쌀 are the same word

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    But English is measure of all things?

    You still seem to think that allophone is when they sound the same. That’s not even part of the definition. In my last comment I elaborated about allophones that sound quite distinct for native speakers. Let me now explain what allophone really is:

    One straightforward definition (that has its flaws) is that allophone is when there are no minimal pairs. You literally gave a minimal pair.

    You can even have two identical phones belonging to different phonemes. German devoices final consonants so /d/ has the allophones [d] and [th]. In effect, “Rat” and “Rad” both have final [th] while being allophones of /t/ and /d/ respectively.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I gave a minimal pair in Korean because they are not allophones in Korean. Your first instinct, “They’re the same picture” was spot on. To an English speaker, they’re the same sound. There are no minimal pairs in English. So… ah forget it. If you don’t get it, you don’t get it.

      I just wish people spent more time trying to understand what others mean instead of more time on why they think others are wrong. Isn’t that why we love linguistics to begin with??

      • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I just wish people spent more time trying to understand what others mean instead of more time on why they think others are wrong.

        As I have aged, this lament has come to characterize about 84% of my worldview.