• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Musk is learning the lesson Google and Youtube learned years ago with the “adpocalypse”. If the whole house of cards depends on ad dollars you have to keep them happy.

    Unless Musk is going to take X (Twitter) completely subscription only, or fund it exclusively out of his own pocket, he is not going to get that “anything I want goes” utopia he keeps crowing about.

    • Delta_V@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      fund it exclusively out of his own pocket

      That’s how newspapers got started - they were propaganda organs of the rich and existed exclusively to manipulate public opinion. Things really haven’t changed that much, but somewhere along the way people were tricked into paying for them.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Except that libel laws exist to regulate things like newspapers, not things like random comments by random users you may not even know is a bot account.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Pretty sure Russia’s owners of Twitter really intend it just to be used as a propaganda backwagon platform, like China’s TikTok, so the funding does not need to be self-sufficient. As long as they get a critical userbase where they can move their propaganda, nerf the criticism, and can’t be taken down because of the ensuing backlash, that’s good enough for them.