• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    When is the industry going to recognize that the camera needs to be flush with the back?

    This is ridiculous

    • bradbeattie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      If the camera really does need to be that thick for lens reasons, couldn’t we at least make the rest of the body bigger with more battery?

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mine does that when I put a cover on my phone.

        The cover is on the same level as the camera as there’s a cutout on that bit.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yes, but then it would be slightly heavier and have way too good of a battery life, reducing power bank sales and having the phone last longer without needing to be replaced due to battery degradation.

      • weew@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Then they can’t advertise that the phone is x.x mm thick (if you ignore the thickest part!)

    • fury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Give it a few more years. At this rate, by 2028, the entire back of the phone will be camera bump and you’ll be able to lay it down on a flat surface at last.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Literally nobody who cares about their phone is rawdogging it. It’s a perfectly sane design assuming there will be a case.

        • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Why? It’s better to have the part most likely to suffer damage also be replaceable

          • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Because it adds more bulk to an already massive device, and it’d be nice to have the device itself be able to withstand bumps and scrapes without needing extra padding.

            • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean, if you want to withstand bumps and scrapes you need padding. But without a case you need the padding to be glued to the phone directly. The bulk remains the same no?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also, fingerprint scanners don’t belong behind the screen.

      Unless you have the greasiest fingers of anyone who ever lived, they just don’t work. I have to lick my fingers to make it see them…

      • odelik@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        As my grandmother used to tell me, “Your hands are dry, go lotion them up sonny.”

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          And from that point on, Granny never did question why lil’ Petey bought lube by the 55gal drum load.

          At least his hands, amongst other things, were soft and well moisturized.