Yeah killing the sparrows was definitely a major L, but intentionally slaughtering a hundred million people in the name of manifest destiny is literally worse than what the Nazis did (who also deserve to be thrown in a pit and burned alive).
Killing sparrows because you think sparrows will ruin crops that feed people is exactly the same as killing buffalo because you think killing buffalo would starve the Lakota into submission.
Even if we accept the other points, a mistake is still morally superior to an intentional action. What the fuck is with this argument?
Yeah killing the sparrows was definitely a major L, but intentionally slaughtering a hundred million people in the name of manifest destiny is literally worse than what the Nazis did (who also deserve to be thrown in a pit and burned alive).
Killing sparrows because you think sparrows will ruin crops that feed people is exactly the same as killing buffalo because you think killing buffalo would starve the Lakota into submission.
To be fair they never made that comparison, I did.
Literally the difference between a crime and not a crime