I know MediaBiasFactCheck is not a be-all-end-all to truth/bias in media, but I find it to be a useful resource.

It makes sense to downvote it in posts that have great discussion – let the content rise up so people can have discussions with humans, sure.

But sometimes I see it getting downvoted when it’s the only comment there. Which does nothing, unless a reader has rules that automatically hide downvoted comments (but a reader would be able to expand the comment anyways…so really no difference).

What’s the point of downvoting? My only guess is that there’s people who are salty about something it said about some source they like. Yet I don’t see anyone providing an alternative to MediaBiasFactCheck…

    • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
      78·
      3 months ago

      The only competition here is between relying on ones own judgment vs. relying on a third party.

        • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
          76·
          3 months ago

          I didn’t say it was a competition or anything remotely like that. Please show me where I did if you believe otherwise.

          Okay

          So you have a very high opinion of your own discretion but assume everyone else is trash or what?

          Where would you put yourself as a percentile?

          Right there. Obviously. In fact, that’s the exact point of a percentile - it’s a ranking system, which is to say, a competition.

          So are you going to answer or not?

          No.

            • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
              41·
              3 months ago

              If you’re not going to answer then I’ll just default to the obvious: you think you’re special and that everyone else is an idiot/sheeple/etc.

              Right - you’ll just assume that I see it as some sort of competition that I’m winning.