• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You can hate it all you want if that makes you feel superior, but it’s still true.

    could also be a pedestrian, a deer or a fallen tree

    High-vis equipment is required here when a person has to spend an extended period on roads outside inhabited areas (actually high-vis gear is mandatory in all motor vehicles), and are required to walk on the left side to always have oncoming traffic in sight as opposed to behind. Larger roads have mitigation structures (mounds, fences, warnings signs, speed limits, or grade separation) where wildlife is known to cause problems. Our taxes pay for road inspection and maintenance services to clear natural or manmade obstacles.

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      actually high-vis gear is mandatory in all motor vehicles

      Wait, what? All this time I’ve been breaking the law by riding in cars without my high-vis vest?

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is “deliberately misunderstanding a sentence” a new olympic sport or something? Because goddamn, I’m putting bets on you winning at least silver (not gold though, that one goes to the crayon muncher that brought up rape for some weird reason).

        I’m sure this will be shocking to you yankees, but not everybody is an American. Over this side of the Atlantic we have actual traffic laws to regulate how multi-ton death machines are operated, and they require certain safety equipment to be present in all vehicles. Things like:

        • Spare tire and related tools
        • Warning triangle (put it on the road behind the vehicle if it gets immobilized)
        • High-visibility vest (mandatory to wear on motorcycles and by pedestrians on paved roads outside administrative city borders)
        • First-aid kit
        • Corrective eyewear if the mandatory medical exam indicates that it is needed
        • echolalia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Since you’re not an American, can you explain why you feel the need to comment on this when you don’t really know what you’re talking about?

          The fine is from an Ohio state law that is (imho) unconstitutional in the United States. These people have been using their horse drawn buggies on these roads for centuries. The roads they go on are rural. Not interstate highways or autobahn or whatever.

          It’s not economically feasible for every country road in the USA to have wildlife mounds/fences because of how vast our country is. Drivers here are required to stop for obstructions, fallen branches and wildlife and if you can’t you’re going too fast. I just don’t buy excuses about this, the Amish aren’t going down the road at 4 am in a blizzard. They’re way more visible than a deer and they have reflectors. I live around here (not Ohio, but basically Ohio), this law is inexcusable and targeting a religious group. It’s also legal to walk down these roads or ride a horse or drive your tractor at 20 kilometers per hour dragging a combine or something. It’s farmland.

          The entire county this takes place in has only 50k people. Rural area.

          I found that other commenters post about rape distasteful by the way. There are better ways to point out victim blaming.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If there are people on the roads they aren’t uninhabited.

      “She was asking for it going to that neighborhood dressed like that.”

      What’s the equivalent of rape culture but for cars mowing people down left and right?