• sudneo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    No, I read it from many newspapers and commentators that were defending her, if that matters. It is also something somewhat compatible with the initial claim of the IBA (having XY chromosomes), but of course nothing is certain at the moment.

    • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They were reporting on the IBAs claim that she had XY chromosomes, which, as stated, has absolutely no credibility. They won’t reveal what test they did or how they arrived at those results. When all evidence suggests they made shit up to disqualify her it’s both disingenuous and cruel to give the claims any credence whatsoever.

        • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Did you even read the full article you provided? It literally says that the only source of the claim is the president of the IBA. It points out that having XY chromosomes could mean intersex and not necessarily trans, but it explicitly says there have been no other claims to support this whatsoever.

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            How is it different from what I said?

            In my very first comment I said exactly what’s written in the article. At the moment the opinion everyone is assuming (this was 1st of August) is that she is in the intersex spectrum. I said “at most” because it’s not even certain.

            Not sure why you think you need to argue when I simply reported what mainstream news was reporting and I am not even contesting what you are saying lol.