It’s a sad case of another day, another round of mass layoffs at a game studio. On this occasion, Destiny developer Bungie has announced it is letting go of 220 employees, or 17% of its workforce. CEO Pete Parsons said the eliminations were due to “financial challenges,” which isn’t going down well, especially after it was discovered he may have spent over $2.4 million on classic cars after Sony acquired the company, and continued buying them even after the previous layoffs.

Bungie blames the job eliminations on “rising costs of development and industry shifts as well as enduring economic conditions.” The Sony subsidiary says it needs to make substantial changes to its cost structure and focus development efforts entirely on Destiny and Marathon.

The cuts will impact every level of the company, including executives and senior leader roles – but not Parsons, obviously.

It was only in October 2023 that Bungie made its last round of layoffs, and the news comes just under two months since the launch of Destiny 2: The Final Shape, which has been well-received.

In December, Bungie devs told IGN that the atmosphere at the company was “soul-crushing” due to fears of more layoffs, extra cost-cutting measures, and a loss of all independence from Sony if Bungie’s financials did not improve. Staff said earlier this year that they feared more job cuts were coming.

The latest layoffs have led to many angry posts on social media from current and former Bungie employees. Destiny 2’s global community lead Dylan Gafner (AKA dmg04) called the move “inexcusable,” and noted that it’s a case of “Accountability falling upon the workers who have pushed the needle to deliver for our community time and time again.”

What’s angering people even further is the discovery of what seems to be Parsons’ account on a car bidding site called Bring a Trailer. It shows he has spent $2.4 million on classic cars since September 2022, which includes $500,000 since the October layoffs.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ok, I get it, 70% of what he earned should have been taken in taxes instead of the abysmal 37% minus all the deductions that generally only apply only to the rich. Point remains the same. Tax these fuckers.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        You lot are constantly talking about how workers are uniformly short-changed on their labor by their employers, underpaid for it and therefore being a profit source for employers, but you never explain why any business would do layoffs like this if that was the case, lol. Do these people who got laid off make the company money or not?

        • CTDummy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You lot

          Very interested in who “you lot” refers to when you’ve had a different commenter every reply in this thread.

          Do these people who got laid off make the company money or not?

          What’s your position here? That labour isn’t exploited and undervalued by the people who profit off it? That if it was, no one ever would be sacked? These companies usually go through phases of hiring talent when they predict they need more labour done (ie when they want to increase profit).

          Seems like Bungie haphazardly acquired more talent than it needed, presumably under the assumption that the company would grow indefinitely. It didn’t. So what’s the easiest and shittiest way to bring the company ledger out of the red?? You guessed it, sack them. There’s also a bit of an upset at the idea of paying executives million dollar salaries, then sacking hundreds of actually productive employees.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            sacking hundreds of actually productive employees.

            If they were “actually productive”, sacking them would hurt the bottom line, not help it.

            • CTDummy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yeah no. If that was all you managed to get from my reply then it isn’t worth continuing this discussion.

        • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          HERE is some information regarding these companies and CEOs that you are stupidly and disgustingly sticking up for. Hope that helps.