“Suno’s training data includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet.”

“Rather than trying to argue that Suno was not trained on copyrighted songs, the company is instead making a Fair Use argument to say that the law should allow for AI training on copyrighted works without permission or compensation.”

Archived (also bypass paywall): https://archive.ph/ivTGs

  • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Also policing training would be completely unenforcable

    That’s where laws would come in. Obviously it would have civil law, not criminal law, but making sure it would be enforceable would have to be part of such laws. For example, forcing model makers to disclose their training dataset in one way or another.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      But you can already train models at home also you can just extend existing models with new training data. Will that be regulated too? How?

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They‘re literally already about to heavily regulate hobby AI to ensure giant corporations that hoard all our information get to make even more mountains of money with it. The idea that anyone gets to use any media for machine learning is already a relict of the past and in fact not remotely comparable to learning things for yourself. Especially not in the legal sense. Did you really naively believe AI will democratize anything for even a second?