• magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This shit makes me glad that there’s a constitutional amendment specifying that the inauguration must take place at noon on January 20th.

    I assume the Republicans will only try to delay the inevitable if they lose. They can file as many lawsuits and motions as they want. If Harris wins, she’s being inaugurated in January. Period. Even the shitty Supreme Court we’re currently saddled with won’t try to delay a date and time that’s clearly spelled out. Angry Republicans can try to reverse it, but good luck with that.

    • chellewalker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      “Now hold on there; it doesn’t say what year that inauguration needs to happen.” -exerpt from Supreme Court hearing on F-ck v. You.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Except it specifies ‘of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified’, which pretty much says its the January after the election. If not, they can just make Biden president for longer lol.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure… So Biden and Harris keep hold of the office or Biden steps down and Harris would have to choose her VP. Which I assume she would choose her running mate. That doesn’t really sound like a good plan for the slow learners either

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Constitution doesn’t say that we can’t appoint Trump as dictator while we figure it out” - Uncle Thomas

          Oh whom am I kidding, dude doesn’t even know how to say a sentence with more than five words.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            The courts can’t make rules, they can’t just perceive what was there. So it’s either election validated, or not validated yet, meaning the office wouldn’t hand over power. Congress would have to write an amendment for that to happen (2/3rds vote, which neither party holds)

            • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              SCOTUS ruled on a case of something that didn’t even happen, just a “what if”. They absolutely can make shit up and rule on hypotheticals.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Which rule did they make that was not written by Congress and misinterpreted. You are fishing far further than the supreme Court to find that I fear and I want them held to charges.