• Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    5 months ago

    Harris was a prosecutor, and a successfully I hear, there was never any chance Trump would risk debating her on live TV. He maybe able to fire hose lies against Biden, but Harris would rip him apart, and the best part is, he knows it. He has nothing to gain from debating her, so he will come up with excuse after excuse to avoid it.

    • solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Harris ran for president in 2019 but did terribly in the first dem primary debate and dropped out early, fwiw. We’ll see what happens vs Trump.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        5 months ago

        Trump is easier to debate for democrats who don’t care as much about decorum as Biden. A primary debate requires much more delicacy, because you can’t all out attack the others without potentially prejudicing voters against your party’s eventual nominee, should you lose.

        Biden did well in the latter scenario, because he’s very good at politicking. I think Harris would do better in the former because of her greater willingness to openly mock trump. Hopefully we get to see.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        Did she do terribly during the debate? I remember watching and thinking she seemed smart and articulate, but didn’t have the name recognition and backing to get very far in the primaries.

        • solrize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          She was a party favorite but Tulsi Gabbard called her out on her prosecutorial record and that ended her, I believe.