EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to science@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoLK-99 isn’t a superconductor — how science sleuths solved the mysterywww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkLK-99 isn’t a superconductor — how science sleuths solved the mysterywww.nature.comEmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to science@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaredaisy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoEven though it’s not a superconductor, does it have any interesting properties useful on an industrial scale? Or are there already other materials with similar properties that are easier to manufacture?
Even though it’s not a superconductor, does it have any interesting properties useful on an industrial scale? Or are there already other materials with similar properties that are easier to manufacture?