• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    yet another useless feature annoyance

    Android already blocks sideloading by default at an operating system level.

        • kora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung 's Version of Android is introducing.

            • kora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Thatsthejoke.jpg

              Sorta

              I’m just pointing out that the entirety of Samsung’s Android adds literally nothing of value to the user to the android experience and only serves to, at best, annoy. Not just this one particular feature.

              • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I think perhaps something has gone wrong with the phrasing or something, because it seemed you were saying the exact same thing but … less clearly?

                it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung*'s Version of Android* is

                which now I edit that so it doesn’t have a strike through I actually understand what you mean. It was a bit difficult to parse that originally

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Is it? Android already disables sideloading by default, requires each source to ask for permission, and prompts the user before each install. How does Samsung’s additional setting improve security?

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Android already blocks sideloading by default at an operating system level.

      …no, it doesn’t?

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You can see the instructions to disable it in the screenshot of the thumbnail.

    This article is pointless.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I mean this goes for “news” in general.

        Some days are slower than others. If you’re not producing “news”, you’re not making money.

        What do you do? Fabricate “news” whenever you can.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      The question in the title is just a hook, but this is still an article, not a Q&A.

      The text tells why the feature matters, tells it’s redundant, lists the phones affected by it, echoes some Samsung notes about the feature, and answers the question. It’s a report on a particular feature, I wouldn’t call it a filler.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago
    1. Return the Samsung phone
    2. Buy from a company that isn’t hostile towards its customers
      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Besides what the other user said, they recently made it a requirement for accredited phone services that they destroy any samsung phones along with their data, that they receive for servicing, if they have found that the user has done “unauthorized servicing” on it.
        This is the next step after making the phones practically impossible to be disassembled, which they have done years ago.

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    What are some of the best alternatives? With comparable specs (in the US)?

    Right now I have a Fold and honestly really like the foldables. Though I think the Pixel Fold is my only alternative there.

    • unrushed233@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the Pixel Fold might be the best option for a foldable phone, because (just like all other Pixels) you can flash it with a private, secure, open-source ROM like GrapheneOS.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If you mean the S24, the equivalent from Sony would be the Xperia 5 V. Has audio jack and sd card compared to the S24, Sony batteries last 2 days even after several years of use thanks to excellent optimization and battery care, there’s almost zero bloat. On the downside it will only get 2 years of upgrades (until the end of 2025). Also you can’t unlock the bootloader on US models if that’s something you care about.

      https://gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=12773&idPhone2=12534

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Motorola makes the clamshell fold. Seems to be a lot better value as well. Can’t speak to all the bloatware and other anti-consumer shitfuckery because I’ve never seen a reviewer that thinks it’s important.

    • Ilandar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      deleted by creator