JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 months agoGooglingprogramming.devimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down115
arrow-up1998arrow-down1imageGooglingprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 months agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squareEvotech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·4 months agoShould start asking them like, why did you do this? Why did you chose this method? To make them sweat :p
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 months agoThat used to make sense when LLMs were not the thing, when evaluating assessments from students, half of which asked someone else and didn’t bother to even read the code
minus-squarehowrar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·4 months agoIf no one can make sense of the change, then you reject it. Makes no difference if it was generated with an LLM or copy-pasted from Stackoverflow.
minus-square31337@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 months agoI just ask ChatGPT to review pull requests.
Should start asking them like, why did you do this? Why did you chose this method? To make them sweat :p
That used to make sense when LLMs were not the thing, when evaluating assessments from students, half of which asked someone else and didn’t bother to even read the code
If no one can make sense of the change, then you reject it. Makes no difference if it was generated with an LLM or copy-pasted from Stackoverflow.
I just ask ChatGPT to review pull requests.