Nope. Child abuse is fucking disgusting, immoral, and should not be encouraged. But the whole ‘child pornography’ thing is vague so it makes cases like this arise. This should be reformulated to not include just nudity and,in general, equated with a tape containing video of a crime
Child pornography is not necessarily abuse. Even if it was, preventing the distribution or posession of the evidence won’t make the abuse go away. We don’t arrest everyone with videotapes of murders, or make it illegal for TV stations to show people being killed.
I read it and it seems reasonable. Child pornography is not always children having sex, it also could be a photo of one’s own child. I know at least one case that such a law was exploited by a government: https://www.imrussia.org/en/human-rights/3405-december-2021-the-ingush-case,-memorial-and-ovd-info,-yuri-dmitriev
~~PS: IDK who’s Aaron Schwartz ~~
Edit: ah, yes JSTOR case. Fuck Elsevier.
PS2: look at Sartre and his mistress Simona support letter for legalizing pedophilia
And that one case means we should give free reign to child pornography? What the fuck.
Nope. Child abuse is fucking disgusting, immoral, and should not be encouraged. But the whole ‘child pornography’ thing is vague so it makes cases like this arise. This should be reformulated to not include just nudity and,in general, equated with a tape containing video of a crime
But that’s not what Aaron said there, did he? He’s pretty clear about what he’s saying and what he said is fucking disgusting.
Like, let’s reread it together