• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s not entirely surprising when a company chooses to stop paying for the upkeep and continued development of an app for a product it’s no longer making money on

    How much fucking upkeep can an app require to operate a pair of shoes?

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re questioning the sanity of people who even develop shoes that need an app

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not questioning sanity, I’m questioning why an app that does nothing but send commands over Bluetooth or whatever needs any maintenance whatsoever.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Inevitably what happens after 5 years is that someone reports that the app doesn’t work well with a newer version of iOS or Android, and the person that led the engineering on it is gone, because much of your engineering org has turned over after 5 years.

      Then a new person jumps into the old project, finds out that it’s had 1 active user last year, then they question why they have to spend a week bug fixing something for one end user.

      • Knossos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        As a developer, this is the answer. I can’t wait for the day I can finally stop supporting old Amazon Kindle devices.