Drew@sopuli.xyz to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 5 months agoBelchingsopuli.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1357arrow-down131
arrow-up1326arrow-down1external-linkBelchingsopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyz to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 5 months agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·5 months agoOr (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoUh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
minus-squareji17br@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 months agoHe’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
minus-squareabsGeekNZ@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 months agoThis “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14 If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46 If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66 At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.
Or (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
Uh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
He’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
This “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish
If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14
If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46
If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66
At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.
deleted by creator