…and do you think that you posting it has a positive, neutral or negative effect on the world?
By content I mean what ever you’re posting online. The pictures you post on Instagram/Pixelfed or messages you’re writing on Lemmy, YouTube comment section, Facebook and so on.
If you look back at what you have posted in the past year for example, do you consider it to be the kind of content that you would gladly consume if it was coming from someone else? If not, then why are you posting it in the first place?
My comments are pure Internet gold. I’m actually only here to read my own comments. It helps me remember how brilliant and humble I am.
My posts help people discover the game
MineTestLuanti. It’s pretty great, and it’s free.and open-source.
True. I don’t post the license prominently, but my comments are Creative Commons, Attribution, Share Alike
Okay, I’m actually kidding about misunderstanding which bit of my comment your reply was to.
Yes, it’s great that MineTest is open source! And the mod community is impressive.
You actually did reminde me to try minetest again right now! I tried it last like a decade ago and been meaning to try again
What is minetest?
MineTest is an open source game engine that allows running various open source Minecraft clones.
What made me think about this is my girlfriend, who is quite vocal about the harms social media can have on the mental health of young girls, especially when influencers post heavily edited photos of themselves and their lives, which for the most part are fake.
However, she’s active on social media as well, and being quite an attractive woman, she seems oblivious to what I consider a factual statement: her own content is also causing the same kind of concerns for other women who are not as genetically blessed as she is. What she’s posting is not fake, but it is heavily curated nonetheless. She obviously knows this herself, but do her followers?
I don’t personally follow her social media, but I’d be willing to bet she hasn’t posted about being sick for a week and not taking a shower for four days. I don’t mean that as a criticism per se, but I think it highlights how little we think about the effect our own content has on others while still being quick to judge others for what they post.
“She’s hot, but really ought to keep it on the DL for me to enjoy and no one else to see because think of the children”.
What a weird little humble brag while also putting down your girlfriend and blaming her for broader society’s behavior. If she’s not lying, advocating for unhealthy habits or trends, encouraging parasocial relationships, or spreading misinformation, she’s not the problem.
What’s up with the quotation marks when you just came up with that “quote” yourself? I don’t feel the need to defend views I don’t hold.
But if you don’t thoughtfully respond to every strawman, then the internet WINS!
Now what were we talking about? Something about how content impacts us or what?
If you look at the Trump candidacy and things like qanon, it’d be hard to argue that the internet isn’t making inroads. My generation let this go on for long enough, it’s not about the lulz anymore. Lots of people are getting hurt, and it can still get worse.
I hope that’s not the only lens you see the world through. I don’t think anybody else saw that comment the way you did.
Multiple upvotes on my comment indicates I’m not the only one tired of Boomer “shit on my partner” humor.
Arguably, if you’re producing your own content then you’re consuming it too. It takes a lot of watch and/or listen multiple times to produce a final product which means you’re more than consuming it.
I lose count of how many times I replay a given animation shot before I consider it final. Probably 300 or 400
Sure. Heck, occasionally I do actually do that, like if I post a piece of information that I’ve looked up and then refer back to it later.
Yes, and I often reread my own comments and feel a deep sense of satisfaction.
You’re not alone in that.
I also reread your comments sometimes with a deep sense is satisfaction.
(I’m kidding. Although I did check your comment history to make sure you weren’t a monster before even making that joke.)
My toxic trait is never posting anything I wouldn’t want read aloud in front of my grandmother.
I don’t post almost anything online. I mostly just comment. But even the comments I make I sometimes consume as content - I really like comming back and rereading them to enjoy how good and smart I’ve been.
I occasionally go through my old comments to see how things got received, see if I could improve my wording, things like that. General communications skill polishing. It’s not consuming as much as critically reviewing, but whatever.
Since I’m adding engagement on lemmy, and I do put some effort in to be amusing or informative or whatever (usually anyway), yes I do feel like I am helping. If I was on reddit or something, not so much.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who has ever done that! Haha
My 'content ’ is almost entirely dumb comments that are often barely related to the post. Definitely not adding to the world, but hopefully no one takes it seriously enough for it to have any negative impact other than just wasted space.
hopefully no one takes it seriously enough for it to have any negative impact
There is always one, and their goal always seems to be to frustrate you into engaging with them
Lemmy has actually made me more thoughtful about this. Like a lot of people here, I was previously on reddit, where most interactions were pretty toxic. Now I do try to think about how my contributions make the platform better or more useful for others.
I was a “top 1% poster” on reddit (according to them), but it was mostly garbage and reposts and “zingers” so even though it got a lot of updoots, it was not really helpful to people. There were some communities that were exceptions, where I put a lot of effort, research, etc., but they were more niche.
If it’s any consolation, reddit sort of trains you to post things like that because that’s what the masses like and recognize the most.
I don’t consciously “produce” any “content”, and calling it “consuming” seems gross and shallow.
It’s the bland, neutral and “scientific” way of describing an activity. We’re all effectively content creators here where as lurkers only consume.
Yes. If I can enjoy other people’s corny jokes and snarky comments, I would probably like my own too.
Yes, I would, and I do. I’ve made videos etc that I’ve enjoyed making and enjoyed watching, same with pictures etc.
Do repos on GitHub and assorted messages on text-based communication platforms count as content? Because if that’s the case, then all the time, because I generally write stuff down in case I proceed to forget exactly what that function did or why I calculated this bypass coefficient like this or why for the love of fuck does vivado keep reverting to incremental synthesis and how did I fix it last time aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
As for if my random technical nonsense has any bearing on the world, not really, outside of maaaybe the demoscene if the SID stuff works out, and the few people who like reading my ramblings for some reason.
what’s incremental synthesis ?
Aa far as I’m aware, incremental synthesis is vivado trying to build a new FPGA bitstream by modifying a snapshot of the previous build, to ostensibly save time. Because the SID FPGA implementation is a relatively small part of the MEGA65 core, it really likes to forget to add any changes I make, especially related to timing optimization (it took me so long to figure out it had re-enabled itself, after disabling it my total negative slack was cut in half due to it finally registering all the pipelining and other optimization). I’ve also had vivado outright lock up with some cases.
Thanks, that clears it up
Just joking, I love that you explained further but to be honest I still have no idea what is going on, haha. The bit about “modifying a snapshot of the previous build” sounds like the idea behind binary diffing?
Ok, I looked up Vivado and now I have a better idea. A field very alien to me but fascinating to hear about
FPGAs are good fun, and some of the stuff I’m working on in particular gets even crazier. My current project is emulating a partially analog soundchip (the 6581 and 8580 SIDs) with 32 bit integers, because FPGAs can’t do analog. The best part is, it actually (mostly) works. Still have coefficient issues with the RC circuits, and the Rf1 and Rf2 voltage-controlled resistor coefficient tables need to be recalculated, but it’s already looking pretty good.
Good fun lol
Are you trying to replicate functionality from older hardware ?
Correct. Goal is to emulate the SIDs, and the filters are analog, so analog simulation is required.
Depends on the content. I’d play games I make. But I wouldn’t read my own stories outside of proofreading. What would be the point? I already know the story because I wrote it!
As for my SM posts: Same as the writing. But if someone else was posting what I post, then yeah. I would follow that person because we are practically the same person.
I already do that for nostalgia and memories, I like going through my camera roll every so often despite the fact I don’t take many pictures.
