• walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    The article only hints at this in the end, but there’s a lot of money to be made in selling learning material to schools.

    My opinion: While the origins of the “three cueing” method may have been well intentioned I’m guessing lobbying and kickbacks are what’s keeping it in schools, not it’s effectiveness.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      While the origins of the “three cueing” method may have been well intentioned I’m guessing lobbying and kickbacks are what’s keeping it in schools, not it’s effectiveness.

      There is also the fact that the resistance to classic phonics in the USA developed as an anti-Bush stance during the 2000s. People thought they were taking a progressive stance against his family’s conservative ideas about reading by adopting the cueing methods.

      Turns out his family’s passionate attack against cueing was actually completely justified even by the science of the time, let alone what we know now.

      Bush is not a good guy but partisanship has ruined multiple generations of Americans’ ability to read, and this cueing bullshit has been leaking into other countries too.