• kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It wasn’t a debate. It was 2 hours of clip harvesting in which the right got everything they could possibly want while the left got squat diddly

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only an idiot would think this ever could have gone differently. I fucking hate the democrats. The fact I have to keep voting for them is really pissing me off.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, now they will run those lies on every social media timeline and they’ll look believable to low information voters

          • kandoh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            A low information voter, also known as a misinformation voter, is someone who participates in elections despite being generally poorly informed about political issues[1]. This term has been popular in the United States since the mid-1990s.

            Key characteristics of low information voters include:

            1. They tend to have more moderate ideological views compared to high-information voters[1].
            2. They are less likely to vote, but when they do, they often choose candidates based on personal appeal rather than policy positions[1].
            3. They are more likely to be swing voters and vote split-ticket[1].
            4. They may rely on cues or heuristics, such as a candidate’s appearance or behavior, rather than substantial information to make voting decisions[1].
            5. They can be more susceptible to emotional appeals on various topics, including the economy, immigration, and racial relations[4].

            Low information voters often lack fundamental facts about government and exhibit a low “need for cognition,” meaning they are less inclined to engage in effortful thinking about complex issues[4]. This can make them more vulnerable to misinformation and less likely to critically evaluate candidates’ claims or policy positions[4].

            It’s important to note that the term “low information voter” is sometimes used pejoratively, particularly in American political discourse[1]. However, the concept is studied seriously in political science to understand voting behavior and its impact on electoral outcomes.

            Citations: [1] Low information voter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_information_voter [2] What Are Low Information Voters? - ThoughtCo https://www.thoughtco.com/low-information-voters-5184982 [3] Trump Is Preying on Low-Information Voters - New York Magazine https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-low-information-voters.html [4] ‘Low information voters’ are a crucial part of Trump’s support https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/07/low-information-voters-are-a-crucial-part-of-trumps-support/ [5] The Tragedy Of Rush Limbaugh’s Low Information Voter Theory https://www.forbes.com/sites/cedricmuhammad/2013/08/27/the-tragedy-of-rush-limbaughs-low-information-voter-theory/

            • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Not going to lie, I’ve never seen it used outside of its pejorative use. I will assume it’s safe to imply that you aren’t using it that way, and with that explanation I’m satisfied that it is a real term with real uses.

              This does describe most voters who are not just permanently voting red or blue though…