• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 days ago

    Like, how do you even screw this up? Sony…the ones who have access to all the super secret technical documents, full source codes, CAD drawings, prototypes, probably even people still working there who worked on it originally etc. Things that many who work on the open source emulators can only dream of seeing.

    Made a shit emulator.

    • DarkMetatron@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Creating a good emulator takes a lot of time and money, and that I think is the true reason why.

      What they have released is a MVP, a minimum viable product, it checks all the boxes for a releaseable thing and that’s what the higher ups, the product leads and other finance stakeholders want to hear.

      Additional features or proper scaling? Yeah, nice we put that on the list for MVP+, for sure! When will that come? Nobody knows and we have no development time to work on it because now with the release the focus was shifted to the next project, but it is on the list and we will come back to it.

      I have heard that so often in so many projects I was part of, as a grunt with no power, and for nearly all of them I still wait for the MVP+ time to ever happen.

      • Titou@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Them, the ones having full control on the platform, failed were foss developpers succeed. They have no excuse.

        • DarkMetatron@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          FOSS developers have no cost reporting, no meetings with C level and stakeholders, no shareholders, no release plans, no schedules. What they have is passion.

          They just created what they want to create, they have a deep personal agenda to make something they want to use for themselves and that has to have therefore the polish and quality they want to have it to have.

          The corporate developers wanted to make a good product too I am very sure, but if the higher ups say that it has to be released by a fixed date then there is not much that the developers can do about it.

          So yes, the company has no real excuses, besides money.

          • Titou@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Many situations proved to us that passion make better things, sadly today’s AAA game developpers dosn’t have any passion anymore, mostly because of pression made by boss who are only driven by money.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wouldn’t it be a lot cheaper to buy a license from an emulator project, hire one or two from the team, and give them access to internal info to help fix things up? Then your internal team just integrates it with the console and you ship it.

            That sounds way cheaper than NIH…

            • DarkMetatron@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              There are not much good commercial emulator projects, and open source emulators are not easy to license due to the nature of the open source licences (often GPL 2 or 3) used.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                A iot of the FOSS projects are developed by a handful of people, often just one or two. So you buy a licence from those individuals and remove and replace the rest. Or just hire the one or two devs and they can pull in the bits they wrote. You’re always free to relicense your work.

                And if it’s GPL v2, there’s no problem because you can probably treat it as “firmware” since it’s a console and not a PC (e.g. like TiVo did). GPL v3 blocks that loophole though.

                • DarkMetatron@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Sounds complicated and like a lot of potential legal trouble, have it done by their own staff seems easier.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      They even messed up the emulation on their PS Classic, despite being based on a simpler console and having full control of the hardware and software.

    • BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I stopped blaming greed because it holds no one responsible and is like calling a lion a murderer, or a tapeworm a parasite. The product is bad because everyone who works at Sony is incompetent and dumb.

      • DarkMetatron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would not say everyone but everyone in power is incompetent and dumb.

        The normal employee who just hast to do as told can only do as told and if that means that all the good features and functionalities are out of scope then that it is. It has nothing to do with the competence or intelligence of the employee

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It looks like their complaints are primarily about how they handle processing the output (scaling and filters). That’s not anything having internal documents helps with.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can’t they just like … buy the rights to a PS2 emulator that is already working?

    Or at least hire the people who created it?

    Doubt the PS5 is much different from a PC.

  • MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Microsoft is a terrible company, but at least they treat their back catalogue with some degree of respect. I just wish Sony cared more.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      In my experience Xbox to 360 was not that good. Fable stuttered a lot.

      PS2 to PS5 though, yeah, I know Sony’s architectures have been all over the place, but come on.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It might have been your console. The 360 was the last MS console I had (PS3 was the last actual console) and I had no issues playing the fable games.

        • brsrklf@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Not Fable games, just Fable, the one running through backward compatibility. I had no problem with Fable 2 and 3, or any other actual 360 game.