• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I honestly can’t believe they haven’t tried to give shooting courses to kindergartners.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You anti gun people are using the same argument as religious people talking about sex ed. “Should we teach kids how to be safe around guns? No! Just make sure they never ever encounter one!”

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’m only half joking, because at this point the kids might as well be able to fight back rather than us doing fuck all while countless are fed to the golden throne.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The one I linked specifically mentions shooting afterwards for kids as young as 7…

          But yes if guns are at home they should be locked (and really locked, like a trigger lock plus a safe that’s set to something besides 1111, holy crap you’d be surprised) and totally inaccessible to kids. Teaching single digit age kids about guns is not a substitute for that, but of course I’m not saying you shouldn’t teach your kids that they shouldn’t touch guns and what they can do.

          And teaching kids about guns will not solve the serious gun problems in America. That pretty much every other industrialized nation has figured out already.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            And teaching kids about guns will not solve the serious gun problems in America.

            Ok but it’s still a pretty obviously good idea. Will definitely save lives. Children’s lives.

            • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Teaching kids to use guns doesn’t save kids’ lives. If you want to teach em to stay away from guns, that they’re deadly, they shouldn’t touch it and should tell an adult right away go ahead.

              Teaching kids to use guns in the name of gun safety is like saying if you don’t teach a kid to drive what’s to stop them from getting hit by a car.

              • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Do you teach your kids to swim, or to stay away from water? Guess which is more effective at preventing drowning?

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                If you want to teach em to stay away from guns, that they’re deadly, they shouldn’t touch it and should tell an adult right away go ahead.

                That IS gun safety education.

                Also the first rule of gun safety: a gun is ALWAYS LOADED

                • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Stop for one second, re read the conversation, and the link. I’m criticizing teaching 7 year old kids to shoot, not criticizing teaching actual gun safety. That was a straw man you set up to knock down.

              • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                I don’t see the problem with teaching 7 year olds firearm safety. You’re throwing your credibility out the window by including that.

                Beyond that though, it is sad, but it isn’t a gun problem. Yes, getting rid of guns would get rid of most shootings. However, it wouldn’t deal with the underlying problems causing these incidents, and it wouldn’t help the vast majority of violence in schools. Also, most school shootings, contrary to popular belief, are one or two people, not mass shootings. When our schools are a home to bullies, sexually abusive staff, racially segregated districts (yes, in the 21st century), economically segregated districts, republican defunding efforts, a loss of teachers especially during and immediately post-pandemic, and racially based gangs that perform regular violence against each other, it comes as no surprise, at least to me, that this violence is occurring. If it wasn’t a gun, it would be another weapon. We need to focus on the actual problems, not the ones that make us sad and grab our attention, especially when disarming the populace gives our already authoritarian police state even more power.