Another unintended acceleration issue. Fortunately, no one was injured but the Cybertruck still crashed into a house.

This happened in a rich-enough area that it was filmed by someone’s doorbell camera. There’s apparently 50-foot long line of skidmarks.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Interested to see what the public is able to uncover as the core problem.

    I’d be a lot easier for the public to do that if the code were open-source – you know, so that the property owner could control their own property, as they have every right to be able to to do.

    • KamikazeRusher@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t disagree with you. There should be a level of inspection possible by an owner on the functions and processes running, especially if they will be held liable for any outcomes from operating failures that cannot be attributed to the driver.

      In other words, if my insurance covers an accident but I can be sued in civil court for additional damages then I should be able to update/fix/review everything in it given that all liability is transferred to me upon sale. If I cannot answer to something because it’s deemed “proprietary” and “property” of the manufacturer, then they should not be allowed to transfer that liability to me.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Transferring liability for Tesla Involved Accidents back to Tesla sounds like an absolutely fantastic idea. They should definitely be on the hook for stuff like this, if they aren’t already.