I have to navigate an interface like this to access resources from my school and it jams my brain. I don’t know if it’s badly designed but my brain doesn’t know what to click or where to point my eyes when I’m looking for something. I literally have to read each element, visualize what the words represent, and compare it to a visualisation of the thing I’m looking for to guess what I need to click on which proves to be very cognitively straining. I know it sounds pathetically simple but it is an additional dopamine hurdle I have to overcome before I can do any homework or revision. I don’t have this problem on most webpages. I wonder whether it could be ADHD related because my classmates always seem to find relevant resources in the system for things that I turn to Google for because this page is so impermeable.

Here’s another example:

  • Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m a college professor that uses BB and try to make things as easy to access as possible. The same assignments and information can be found in multiple places in the course, i avoid using the jankiest Blackboard applications, I set things up so that text is visible without having to click through another link, etc. But BlackBoard doesn’t make it easy. We’re switching to Blackboard Ultra this Fall, which I think does have some improvements, especially in the UI department, but I’m doubtful it’ll be much better.

  • Madrigal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most modern UIs are shit, and not just for people with ADHD.

    The biggest sins IMO:

    • Everyone has to be unique, instead of sticking to established and successful design patterns. *Breaking existing UI elements (looking at you, infinite scroll).
    • Trying to do everything, all at once.
    • Not getting rid of old shit (hello Microsoft).
    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      What beats me is how people like to say how 90s’ webpages looked horrible. But when I get to a miraculously still functional webpage with 90s’ web design, I feel like I’m walking in a park. Then I get to something such people would call a normal webpage, and I can’t use it. I ask such people and they … are not interested in actually finding something in the pile of crap they call better.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is because its all old and straight to the point. No caveats, no javascript bs, no huge buttons or long loading shit, no css that moves shit around or doesnt work on that one machine with a certain resolution.

        It. Just. Works.

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Caveat: The ones that are still around “just work”. The ones that were overconstructed or relied on now-deprecated elements broke and aren’t still around.

          Remember flash-only websites? I do. How about “Best viewed in Netscape Navigator”?

    • citrusface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      God damn Microsoft why the fuck do you have two versions of outlook and teams what the fuck is wrong with you.

      Why can’t I break teams channels out into a window, why are your alerts so fucking bad. How does shifts in teams not have the option to make a reoccurring schedule. Why is this garbage afterthought of a program what powers every corporation

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Because likely it’s a result of a dozen (at best) clueless managers accepting some kind of UI\UX with consensus. It’s a very slow process, but they want to micromanage everything that they can see and (they think) understand.

      • Madrigal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Two? Colleague from our IT team reckons it’s more like six.

        New Teams has more options for opening new windows, but it’s also more stubbornly determined to open docs in the web app (embedded within Teams of course).

        Shifts is a straight no for my team. And don’t get me started on Planner…

        • citrusface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Please tell me what you use for an alternative to shifts I am on a one man mission to replace it

          Fuck this whole eco system it’s so terrible. It’s what made me switch to Linux at home.

  • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is that blackboard? worst experience i’ve ever had, that interface actively detracts from learning because its so confusing. Our school recently ditched it due to student feedback.

      • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ya that UI is awful. I’m in a science program and random procedures would be placed in whatever week they corresponded to so we would have to comb the whole site for each course until someone found it and posted a link. Blackboard is THE WORST!

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I was actually thinking about this. I think it’s partially because in both pictures, items which have a totally different function are graphically uniform (eg. in the bottom picture, one of the boxes takes you to an action, but another opens a passive PDF), and there are no icons. It’s like if on your computer, the setting app had the same icon as an ordinary folder.