Note: This is US only.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    For sure, but emphasising the Seagate reputation part:

    Expecting the new disks to be good is a foolish thing to do,

    Expecting the refurbished ones to somehow exceed that expectation is even more foolish

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think anyone is expecting a refurbished disk to last longer and I don’t know why you’re trying to argue based on that…

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I expect the failure rate to be higher than on a brand new product, you’re just making the assumption that because it failed once (if it actually did, could simply be a disk that was returned after purchase) it will fail again as quickly, which is a pretty bad assessment.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, though it’s not an assumption, it’s based on the reputation of Seagate making new drives that fail quickly. I’ve made a point of emphasising this.

            Even if the drives were never used they’ve been shipped about a few places, so they will objectively not be as good as new drives, even movement is potential wear on spinning disks—the new drives that are already shit.

            I’m really sorry, but I’m not really sure how I can spell this out clearer than I already have.