• lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That explains the neutral tone. It’s something important far away.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        5 months ago

        Also that newspaper is called “The Fatherland”.

        It’s a pretty good hint of where they stand in the whole Left-Right political spectrum.

        • lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Which is super weird in it self. I mean, do South African white people call their colonist nation their “Fatherland”?

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            5 months ago

            FYI- South Africa is kind of unique in that it was settled by a ruling class as opposed to the normal dregs like most other places.

            The maintained their close relationship to home and superior status to their slaves/servants much longer than other places.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            “mother country” or “motherland” is pretty common for descendants of European colonists/emigrees. I know Germans call it “fatherland” instead, probably the Dutch too

      • FreeFacts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, the Union of South Africa were participants in the war against Germany, so that’s still a bit weird. Don’t know about the affiliation of the magazine in question, but the support for joining the allies wasn’t clear cut, but only a narrow majority among the ruling white class.

        • lengau@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          There was a strong pro-Nazi contingent amongst (mainly) Afrikaans-speaking South Africans. That’s not to say by any stretch that Afrikaners were mostly pro-Nazi, though. Jan Smuts was an Afrikaner and was both a Field Marshal in the South African defence forces and the prime minister during WW2 - he wasn’t exactly pro-British (he fought against them in the second Boer war), but he was very strongly anti-Nazi.

        • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, just like Americans they think it’s their country and the original inhabitants have no place in their country.

      • mononomi@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        Alright this is what I understand as a dutchie

        Hitler is dead and Dönitz is now the leader in Germany, a British newspaper writes today: “Never before in history has the perspective of peace been so ?? made a possibility of the long war”

        The sentence structure is pretty confusing to me and I don’t know some words

        • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thanks you beat me to it.

          Yeah it’s something like how abrupt the change of prospect is from an extended war to peace.

      • fpc;@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Crude translation, trying to keep the word order the same.

        Hitler’s death and Dönitz 's acceptance of rule in Germany led a British paper to write: “Never before in the history has the prospect of peace so suddenly changed to the possibility of a protracted war.”